CD3 CD4 CD8a CD14 CD19 CD56 PD-1 TIGIT CD4 T CD8 T Mono B cell NK TCR clonotypes
Use Case Immune Profiling

T Cell Response Analysis Using RNA, Protein and TCR Profiling

William Guesdon
William Guesdon, Director of Bioinformatics
13 min read · Published 10 April 2026

Data type

CITE-seq + TCR (10x 5')

Pipeline

Cell Ranger + nf-core/airrflow

Platform

Sonrai + AWS Batch

Key Takeaways

  • A single 10x Genomics 5' multi experiment yields three complementary layers of immune data - RNA, surface protein (CITE-seq), and TCR sequences - from the same cells, enabling cell identity, phenotype validation, and clonal tracking in one reproducible pipeline
  • Reference-based annotation resolved 17 immune subtypes; 19 ADT protein markers independently validated every transcriptome-based assignment, demonstrating the power of orthogonal protein confirmation
  • TCR repertoire analysis identified 4,852 unique clonotypes with antigen specificity predictions matching known CMV, EBV, and Influenza epitopes - establishing a high-resolution immune baseline directly applicable to immune monitoring and cell therapy development

Summary

This report presents an integrated multimodal analysis of ~10,000 human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from a healthy donor, combining single-cell gene expression, 19 surface protein markers (CITE-seq), and paired T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing from a single 10x Genomics 5' multi-experiment (10x Genomics). Together, these results establish a high-resolution immune baseline that teams can use to assess whether a patient's immune composition is within normal range, identify expanding or contracting T-cell populations in response to therapy, and prioritise clones for functional validation or cell therapy development.

  • Cell type identification. Reference-based annotation identified 7 major lineages and 17 fine subtypes. T cells (53%) and monocytes (31%) dominate the PBMC compartment, with smaller populations of B cells (9.4%), ILC/NK (4.4%), dendritic cells, and pDC. Surface protein measurements from 19 ADT markers independently validate the transcriptome-based annotations.
  • TCR repertoire. AIRR-compliant analysis processed 4,964 T cells with productive TCR rearrangements, yielding 4,852 unique clonotypes. The repertoire is highly diverse, consistent with a healthy background, with clonal expansion concentrated in CD8 effector/memory T cells (Tem/Temra).
  • Antigen specificity. Database lookup matched 173 T cells to known epitopes, predominantly CMV (81 cells) and EBV (10 cells), consistent with prior viral exposure in a healthy adult.
  • Workflow. The full pipeline runs reproducibly on the Sonrai platform with cloud-native orchestration for TCR analysis and a Python-based workflow for the CITE-seq component. All code, configuration, and outputs are version-controlled.
RNA-based UMAP with annotated cell types showing T cells, monocytes, B cells, NK cells and dendritic cell populations TCR sequences with VDJdb epitope matches projected onto UMAP

Introduction

Single-cell RNA-seq is sufficient to identify the major immune populations in peripheral blood, but multimodal assays provide a richer view of the immune state. Combining gene expression, cell-surface protein abundance (CITE-seq (Stoeckius et al. 2017)), and paired T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoires makes it possible to define cell identity, validate phenotypes with orthogonal protein measurements, and track clonal expansion within the same cells. This approach complements our AI-powered single-cell analysis workflow and our end-to-end RNA-seq workflow, extending the analytical toolkit available for translational immune monitoring.

This use case presents an end-to-end analysis of a public human PBMC dataset generated with the 10x Genomics 5' multi workflow:

  • Cell Ranger multi for joint preprocessing of gene expression, feature barcode, and V(D)J libraries
  • nf-core pipelines for AIRR-compliant TCR repertoire analysis (Ewels et al. 2020; Gabernet et al. 2024)
  • Reference-based cell type annotation and Antibody-Derived Tags (ADT) protein validation
  • TCR-epitope database lookup for antigen specificity prediction

The workflow is designed to run on AWS Batch with Spot instances and S3-backed storage, following the same cloud-native pattern used in the RNA-seq airway use case.

Methods

Data

The dataset is the public 10x Genomics Human PBMC from a Healthy Donor, 10k cells - multi (v2) (10x Genomics 2021).

Property Value
Source10x Genomics public dataset portal
SampleHuman PBMCs from one healthy male donor (age 27, AllCells)
AssaysGene Expression, Feature Barcode (cell-surface protein), BCR, TCR
ChemistryChromium Next GEM Single Cell 5' v2 (Dual Index) with Feature Barcode technology
SequencingIllumina NovaSeq 6000, paired-end 26x90, dual-indexed
Cell Rangerv5.0.0 (Cell Ranger multi)
Cell recovery~10,000 detected cells (16,520 loaded, 91% viable)
Experimental designSingle-donor multimodal PBMC profiling

Analysis Pipeline

The workflow is split into two coordinated branches: multimodal single-cell preprocessing and TCR repertoire analysis.

Step 1: Multimodal preprocessing with Cell Ranger multi

Stage Tool Purpose
Demultiplexing / countingCell Ranger MultiJoint processing of gene expression, feature barcode, and V(D)J libraries
Cell callingCell Ranger MultiConsistent cell calling across modalities
Matrix generationCell Ranger MultiProduce RNA count matrices, ADT counts, and clonotype assignments
QC summaryCell Ranger web summaryAlignment, UMI, feature barcode, and V(D)J metrics

Step 2: TCR Repertoire Analysis

The TCR branch uses an nf-core/airrflow pipeline (Ewels et al. 2020; Gabernet et al. 2024) in assembled mode, taking the Cell Ranger AIRR rearrangement TSV as input for AIRR-compliant V(D)J annotation, clonotype inference, and repertoire statistics (CDR3 length distributions, V/J gene usage, clonal abundance).

Step 3: Downstream Multimodal Interpretation

Stage Purpose
RNA QC and clusteringFilter cells, normalise counts, dimensionality reduction, graph-based clustering
ADT normalisationCentre log-ratio normalisation of surface protein counts
Cell type annotationReference-based labelling at two levels of granularity (broad lineages and fine subtypes)
Protein validationConfirm cell type assignments with orthogonal ADT protein data
TCR integrationMap clonotypes onto transcriptional embeddings via shared cell barcodes
Specificity predictionMatch CDR3 sequences against curated TCR-epitope databases

Cloud execution: The workflow runs on AWS Batch with Spot instances and S3-backed storage. Public Cell Ranger outputs are staged to S3, a workflow orchestrator manages the TCR branch, and outputs are written back to S3 for local rendering - consistent with Sonrai's cloud-native pipeline infrastructure.

Results

Quality Control

After filtering (200-5,000 genes per cell, <15% mitochondrial reads), 10,213 cells were retained from the original 10,548 detected by Cell Ranger.

QC violin plots showing gene count, UMI count, and mitochondrial read fraction per cell after filtering

QC violin plots showing gene count, UMI count, and mitochondrial read fraction per cell after filtering.

Cell Identity

Graph-based clustering identified 18 clusters. Reference-based annotation resolved these at two levels of granularity: 7 broad lineages (T cells, Monocytes, B cells, ILC, DC, pDC, Megakaryocytes/platelets) and 17 fine subtypes including naive and effector/memory subsets of both helper and cytotoxic T cells, MAIT cells, regulatory T cells, naive and memory B cells, classical and non-classical monocytes, DC2, pDC, and NK cells.

RNA-based UMAP with 18 Leiden clusters RNA-based UMAP with annotated cell types
Fine-grained cell type annotation UMAP Cell type composition bar chart

RNA-based UMAP: 18 Leiden clusters (top left), broad lineage annotation (top right), fine subtype annotation (bottom left), and cell type composition (bottom right).

Fine cell type composition

Fine subtype composition across the 17 annotated cell populations.

Protein-Validated Annotation

The panel includes 19 ADT markers spanning lineage (CD3, CD4, CD8a, CD14, CD19, CD56), activation (CD25, HLA-DR), differentiation (CD45RA, CD45RO), and checkpoint (PD-1, TIGIT) markers. Centered log ratio transformation (CLR)-normalised protein expression confirms the reference-based annotations at both cluster and cell type level. The checkpoint markers PD-1 and TIGIT show moderate expression concentrated in T cell subsets - a finding directly relevant to immune checkpoint target identification.

ADT protein expression by Leiden cluster (z-scored CLR) ADT protein expression by annotated cell type

ADT protein expression heatmaps: by Leiden cluster (left) and by annotated cell type (right). CD3 marks all T cell lineages, CD14 is specific to classical monocytes, CD19 to B cells, and CD56 to ILC/NK.

Lineage ADT markers on UMAP: CD3, CD4, CD8a, CD14, CD19, CD56 Functional ADT markers on UMAP: PD-1, TIGIT, CD45RA/RO, HLA-DR, CD25

Left: Lineage ADT markers (CD3, CD4, CD8a, CD14, CD19, CD56) on UMAP. Right: Functional markers including PD-1, TIGIT, CD45RA/RO (naive/memory), HLA-DR, and CD25.

Target ID & Validation

Checkpoint markers like PD-1 and TIGIT identified here represent prime targets for immune oncology programmes. See how Sonrai builds the evidence base for target selection.

Learn more

TCR Repertoire Structure

AIRR-compliant repertoire analysis identified 4,852 unique clonotypes across 4,964 T cells with matched RNA data. TCR detection rate was highest in conventional T cell subsets (>88% in Tcm/Naive helper and cytotoxic T cells, >92% in Tem/Temra cytotoxic T cells), 52% in MAIT cells (expected given their semi-invariant TCR), and low in non-T populations. The repertoire is highly diverse, consistent with a healthy donor: 4,775 singletons, 155 small clones (2-3 cells), and 34 expanded clones (4+ cells).

TCR detection across cell types and clone size projected onto UMAP Clonal expansion categories on UMAP

Left: TCR detection across cell types and clone size projected onto UMAP. Right: Clonal expansion categories - most T cells carry singleton clonotypes; expanded clones cluster in CD8 T cell regions.

Clonal expansion by T cell subset

Clonal expansion by T cell subset. Tem/Temra cytotoxic T cells show the highest proportion of expanded clones, consistent with antigen-experienced effector populations.

The five largest clonotypes are all CD8 T cells, consistent with antigen-driven clonal expansion of cytotoxic effectors:

Clone Cells TRBV TRB CDR3 TRA CDR3 Cell type
4059TRBV7-3CASSLGAPTEAFFCICRSWGKLQFCD8 T
21828TRBV20-1CSARAVLAGDAGEQFFCAHMDSNYQLIWCD8 T
17068TRBV19CASSIKGGLYNEQFFCATDVSDGQKLLFCD8 T
42435TRBV5-1CASSLGETQYFCAVRPYGQNFVFCD8 T
37804TRBV4-1CASSLTGNEQFFCAVQTYSGGGADGLTFCD8 T

Receptor Gene Usage and CDR3 Properties

TRBV gene usage shows a polyclonal distribution with no single dominant gene, consistent with a healthy background repertoire. CDR3 lengths follow the expected distribution for productive TRB rearrangements, centred around 13-15 amino acids.

TRB CDR3 length distribution

TRB CDR3 length distribution showing the expected peak at 13-15 amino acids for productive rearrangements.

Antigen Specificity Prediction

To explore potential antigen specificity, CDR3 beta sequences were queried against a curated database of experimentally validated TCR-epitope pairs. Exact CDR3 amino acid matching identified 173 cells (163 unique CDR3 sequences) with database hits, predominantly targeting common persistent virus epitopes:

  • CMV (cytomegalovirus): 81 cells, including the immunodominant NLVPMVATV (pp65) and KLGGALQAK epitopes
  • EBV (Epstein-Barr virus): 10 cells
  • Influenza A: 5 cells (GILGFVFTL, M1 peptide)
  • SARS-CoV-2: 2 cells
  • HCV: 2 cells

This is consistent with a healthy adult donor who has likely been exposed to CMV and EBV, the two most common persistent herpesviruses in the human population.

TCR sequences with VDJdb epitope match projected onto UMAP VDJdb species breakdown on UMAP

Left: TCR sequences with VDJdb epitope matches projected onto UMAP. Right: VDJdb matches colored by antigen source species. CMV-reactive T cells dominate the matched fraction.

Conclusion

This use case demonstrates a complete multimodal immune profiling workflow, from public 10x data to an integrated PBMC atlas with matched TCR clonotypes and antigen specificity predictions. The key results are:

  • Cell identity: reference-based annotation resolves 17 immune subtypes from RNA, validated by 19 ADT surface protein markers
  • TCR repertoire: AIRR-compliant analysis identifies 4,852 clonotypes; the repertoire is diverse with clonal expansion concentrated in CD8 effector T cells
  • Antigen specificity: database matching reveals 173 T cells with known CMV, EBV, and Influenza reactivity, consistent with a healthy adult donor

The workflow connects transcriptome, surface phenotype, and receptor sequence in a single reproducible pipeline, directly applicable to immune monitoring and translational biomarker discovery. When applied to a disease cohort or treatment study rather than a single healthy donor, the same pipeline supports patient stratification by immune composition, identification of treatment-responsive clones, and prioritisation of candidates for cell therapy development. For a complementary multi-omics approach combining RNA-seq with proteomics and flow cytometry, see our MOFA+ autoimmune clinical trial case study.

Limitations

  • Single healthy donor: findings are descriptive, not comparative. A multi-donor or disease-focused dataset would support stronger biological conclusions.
  • Cell type annotation: reference-based annotation relies on training datasets that may not capture rare or atypical populations. ADT validation helps, but 3 of 19 markers are isotype controls (IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b) with limited biological value.
  • TCR-RNA barcode matching: 4,964 of 5,002 TCR cells matched RNA barcodes (99.2%), but the remaining cells were lost to QC filtering. The clonal threshold was set manually after automatic detection failed on a single-sample dataset.
  • Specificity prediction: exact CDR3 matching is conservative and biased towards well-studied epitopes. Complementary approaches based on structural similarity clustering would provide broader coverage of convergent selection signals.

References

  1. 10x Genomics. 2021. Human PBMC from a Healthy Donor, 10k Cells - Multi (V2).
  2. Ewels, Philip A, et al. 2020. The Nf-Core Framework for Community-Curated Bioinformatics Pipelines. Nature Biotechnology 38: 276-78.
  3. Gabernet, Guillaume, et al. 2024. Nf-Core/Airrflow: An Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire Analysis Workflow. Bioinformatics 40 (9): btae537.
  4. Stoeckius, Marlon, et al. 2017. Simultaneous Epitope and Transcriptome Measurement in Single Cells. Nature Methods 14: 865-68.

Patient Stratification

Apply this multimodal immune profiling approach to a disease cohort to identify treatment-responsive immune signatures and support biomarker-guided trial design.

Learn more

No cost. No risk.

Want to apply this workflow to your own immune data?

Challenge Sonrai to find what others haven't. We'll run a multimodal immune profiling analysis on your dataset - at no cost.

Explore the free showcase

Related Reading

Talk to our team

Sonrai acts as an extension of your team, combining scientific expertise, transparent and reproducible analysis, and a governed research environment to generate decision-ready evidence that can be revisited, reproduced, and built upon throughout the life of a programme.

Book a demo

Author: William Guesdon, Director of Bioinformatics at Sonrai 

Published: 10/04/2026